Hey Folks,
Please give me any feedback on this site, it is linear crossdissolves of some of my photography, not really an informational site. More a linear story, that is different for everyone...
I am concerned with all the alpha'ing and transforms going on, + the crossdisolves of the pics that it may be too processor intensive. Please let me know. Viewing Linear Photographics | Creative Commercial Photography :: Dec 7, 2007 Profile: Linear Photographics specialise in creative commercial photography using the latest digital techniques. http://www.wmccm.co.uk/WMCCM/WMCCM/Companies/ViewCompany.aspx?itemid=1933HOME | Comparison of Two Colour Calibration Techniques for Digital :: File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - View as HTMLpiecewise linear approximation to the brightness mapping of each RGB primary. The . two colour calibration techniques for digital photography: white- http://ecet.ecs.ru.acad.bg/cst08/docs/cp/SIII/IIIB.4.pdfHOME |
My spoiled *** made on my Dell 1.8mghz + 512 ram + plus a nice graphics card... so I may have pushed it too far. I did place the pics pretty far apart so they could stream in on 56k. The History of Architectural Drawing and Its Implications for Design:: File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - View as HTMLphotography), architectural drawing techniques are the result of produce an elevation (orthogonal or oblique) using either the linear or radial http://sitemaker.umich.edu/lucepersonal/proposed_courseHOME |
Please let me know what you think:
http://www.zeroxedbrand.com/dave
:)
That is really the only problem. The CPU Usage. I am running a 700MHZ computer with 128 RAM, pretty crappy I know, but I don't have the worse computer in the world, there are people with worse. Don't forget the little people....lol. If you could in anyway decrease the CPU usage so it doesn't lag, I think everything would be perfect (xcept the hiding buttons in the corner, but they turn colors when you are about an inch in near them, so that isn't THAT important).
Ok I gave it a whirl, here's what I got:
Was pretty choppy. I'm on a 650 MHz, 256 megs of Ram, GeforceIIMX. I must say it looked quite impressive, but just because of how slowly it ran, I'm sure it took away a bit of the quality of your work.
I also gave it a try at work before taking off (That's a 1.5 GHz machine), and it worked a lot better. But then again, it also has 512 Megs of DDR-Ram, and a better graphics card... so that's probably why.
If you could get a similar effect without the huge cpu strain, you'd have gold in your hands right there.
Have a good one,
Uth :nerd:
Where was the last debate on wednesday with Mccain and Obama?
INSTANCE / WAITING FOR SPRING
|