Seems to me like he was - since the "tree in the quad" exists the same for all by existing primarily in the perfect mind of God.
German Idealism - Psychology Wiki::
German idealism was a philosophical movement in Germany in the late eighteenth and early it from earlier idealism, such as George Berkeleys, which held that we can only
http://psychology.wikia.com/wiki/German_IdealismHOME |
He denied the existence of matter on the grounds that we can only make mental representations of what we mean by matter. I don't think this is that same as subjectivism at all. Ask a Philosopher: New Answers (34)::
It seems clear that morality is subjective in that its existence depends on the The British empirical idealist, George Berkeley, was a Bishop who saw
http://www.philosophos.com/knowledge_base/new_archives/answers_34.htmlHOME |
Good point. I think the answer is "sort of."
Berkeley was definitely an idealist and probably took it further than most. He completely denied the existence of an external reality, arguing that what we view as external objects are really only mental representations based on the veil of human perception. This begs the question however, "Does an object cease to exist when I cease to perceive it?"
To get around this tricky little obstacle, Berkeley claimed that since all things are constantly perceived by an omnipotent God, then all things continue to exist within this realm of mental perception.
When you say "non-subjective" im assuming you mean objective, however I could hardly see calling Berkeley an objectivist. Idealism and objectivism are pretty difficult to reconcile with one another. True, he stated that everything that we perceive exists primarily in the perfect mind of God, as you've stated, however he made no comment about an ABSOLUTE reality that was free from the limitations of human perception - only that human understanding was accompanied by the constant and omnipotent perception of God.
Overall, I definitely see what you're saying, and I think Berkeley kind of stumbled over his own ideas when he tried to reconsile and merge the two, but I don't think that it's possible to be both an Idealist and believe in a non-subjective reality. Great question and I hope I answered it.
 Where was the last debate on wednesday with Mccain and Obama?
 INSTANCE / WAITING FOR SPRING
|
Was George Berkeley a non-subjective idealist?